.

Tobacco Free Ordinance Passes in Norcross

Tobacco use would be prohibited on all city property, including parks and sidewalks, but not the streets.

At Monday's monthly council meeting, the Norcross City Council voted 3-1 in favor of a no smoking ordinance, banning the use of all tobacco products on city property.

"It's about the quality of life," said Councilman Ross Kaul, who spearheaded the ban. "I just think that everybody feels it's the direction that we should go."

A ban on smoking inside city buildings has been active for some time, so the new Tobacco Free Facilities Ordinance makes it all inclusive: tobacco use would be prohibited on all city property, including parks and sidewalks, but not the streets.

What do you think of the tobacco ban? Tell us in the comments.

With Mayor Pro Tem Andrew Hixson officiating the meeting since Mayor Bucky Johnson was absent (therefore, Hixson did not vote), there was a heavy discussion on the matter, even though opinions had been voiced already at the and . Councilmembers raised questions on what exactly the ordinance prohibits and doesn't prohibit.

All tobacco products, including smokeless tobacco, would be banned. Additionally, the smoking-designated areas for employees that were implemented before are now gone, but locals are , according to Kaul.

The only councilman who voted against the ban was David McLeroy.

"I don't have a problem with someone walking through the park, smoking, or on the sidewalk," said McLeroy, who's not a smoker himself. "I don't know why they would want to stand on the crosswalk and smoke."

McLeroy believes the restriction is not necessary since most smokers are conscious enough to not blow smoke in others' faces. He added that the no smoking signs in parks would be an eyesore, too.

"If you're a smoker, we're not saying you're a bad person," reasoned Kaul. "We're just saying that our right is stronger than your right; in other words, if you want to smoke, that's fine, but you don't smoke in our presence, so we have to inhale secondary product, which is proved to be worse than primary product."

This ordinance is only a baby step, said Kaul, and revisions more than likely will follow. Because it's a new ordinance, fines and policing the new law have not been placed yet.

Other items on Monday's meeting agenda:

-Lifelong Norcross resident Edwin Moulder was presented a proclamation celebrating his 95th birthday.

-The Transportation Investment Act project list was approved, with the actual act to be voted on July 31.

-The following items on the consent agenda were approved: the Safe Routes to School policy for ; adding a fourth severe weather device near Norcross High School; the budget was amended for Wingo Street property upgrades for the Norcross Police; landscaping projects throughout the city; and an official zoning map of the city.

-The rezoning of three buildings at 5235 and 5225 Langford Drive from C-2 to ODW (from commercial to office distribution warehouse) was approved.

-Two items were tabled: the parking study for extra spaces to be added along Wingo Street and Norcross City Hall, and the Gwinnett Convention and Visitors Bureau hotel/motel tax.

Don’t miss any Norcross news. Subscribe to Norcross Patch’s free newsletterlike us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Chuck Cimarik May 09, 2012 at 02:11 AM
Interesting comments on the Gwinnett Daily Post's article on this http://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/news/2012/may/07/norcross-bans-smoking-in-city-parks/
Mike Swiderski May 09, 2012 at 02:57 PM
Norcross Smoking Ban "The only councilman who voted against the ban was David McElroy." Thank you, there is a singular point of sanity left. Every Law is an infringement of an individuals rights, yours are next. If "Quality of Life " is the intent, one vehicle riding through Norcross provides more "noxious fumes" than probably all the outdoor smokers combined --- are cars banned? I believe this is the same type tunnel vision thinking that the county used to create the costly non-used "pay to ride in lanes" which took away the HOV energy and emission savings lanes. Not Happy here, I voted to put Norcross on my banned list for trade and commerce. Sincerely, 42 yr Norcross Resident
John Smithson May 10, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Andrew Hixson was unable to vote during this meeting acting as Mayor Pro Tem. Sarah you should update.
Sarah Bakhtiari (Editor) May 10, 2012 at 06:14 PM
I thought it was evident since the article states there were only four votes and Hixson officiated the meeting. I hope the update works for you!
Sarah Bakhtiari (Editor) May 12, 2012 at 03:31 PM
Remember to keep things civil when voicing your opinion. Any comment with defamatory, abusive, obscene, profane or offensive language will be removed. Please abide by Patch's Terms of Use: http://norcross.patch.com/terms

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something