patching...
Update: Like Norcross Patch on Facebook! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Elected Officials to Hold Wireside Chats

Elected officials in each of the 10 Atlanta-area counties will be holding June "wireside chats" to answer citizens' questions on the upcoming TSPLOST vote. 

DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis and Decatur Mayor Floyd will hold a session on June 13 at 7:30 p.m.

Charlotte Nash, chairwoman for the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners, and Norcross Mayor Bucky Johnson will hold a session on June 7 at 6:15 p.m.

Citizens can access the session by calling 404.463.3227 or by visiting the website.

Each chat will last for one hour and will focus on projects in the local officials' areas. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions directly of their local officials. If a question is not answered during the call, the caller will receive a response via email.

On July 31, residents across the 10-county Atlanta region including Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry and Rockdale counties, as well as the City of Atlanta, can vote on a referendum to fund $8.5 billion in transportation improvements across metro Atlanta through a regional 1 percent sales tax.

The list of projects to be built with the revenue was created in 2011 with input from more than 200,000 regional residents. The list is available at here.

What do you think about TSPLOST? Will you be voting?

bulldogger

5:19 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Vote - NONONONO No more new taxes or tax increases until our county's, state and country's economic conditions improve.

Reply

Marsi Thrash

8:01 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

The economic conditions cannot improve without improved infrastructure and a transportation plan.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bulldogger

8:28 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

So, Marsi Thrash, with your logic, it's another one of those......."We have to pass it to see what's in it" thing......NO, Marsi I'm not falling for that.

Comment_arrow

Bryan Farley

4:19 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Bulldogger, what Marsi Thrash is saying is let's do something to fix our situation instead of your "Lets vote no for everything and hope things get better by doing nothing" plan.

Frank Jones

9:48 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Economic conditions can improve without improved infrastructure. If you look at the proposed t-splost projects, they're not monumental not significant to improving our traffic issues. T-splost is flawed based upon how it is to be funded...a sales tax. Road improvements should be funded via gasoline tax AND income tax. This will ensure that everyone who benefits pays.

The idea that each Georgia region should decide and pay separately is insane as we're all connected and benefit. There is also a state pool of transportation $ that will be allocated. I believe that Atlanta has and will continue to fund projects in other parts of the state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

American Patriot

10:17 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

The only problem with funding our road projects with a sales tax on gas or diesel is that vehicles are becoming more efficient and we are using less fuel. We also tend to conserve more when the price is high. So in order to generate the same revenue we are going to have to increase the tax on the product. The other thing to consider with the TSPLOST and I may be wrong but I believe that SPLOST taxes must be used for their specific projects and that the funds do not go into the general fund.

Comment_arrow

Eric Hovdesven

4:42 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

I agree 110% that sales taxes are a horrible way to fund road expansions. And to make matters worse the TSPLOST actually exempts the sale of Gasoline.

We already subsidize driving to heavily with a portion of our property taxes going to roads, a portion of the Host tax going to roads, zoning regulations that end up making employers give free parking, the list goes on.

Yes cars are becoming more fuel efficient, but we still are driving more, plus most of the tax on gas is percentage based so the increased gas prices have increased revenues. If it results in people driving less that is great! Another alternative is tolls. Its easy to tie road funding to the user - taxes that are more closely tied to the user while not always a viable option (schools) should always be pursued. In this case a greater reliance on gas taxes or tolls, a annual miles driven tax, or even a parking space tax offer potential ways to make the market more efficient.

Marsi Thrash

11:52 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Companies will not locate in Metro Atlanta if we don't have a long-term transportation plan. An increase in the gas tax would have to a minimmum of $.20 per gallon. And it can't be used on anything but roads or bridges. No thanks. This is the fairest tax option.

Reply
Comment_arrow

bulldogger

10:14 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

Marsi Thrash, you work for a governmental agency that has a stake in the passage of this tax, right

North Georgia Weather

7:19 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

No thanks Marsi. No TSPLOST for me! Additional taxes don't bring new businesses.

Reply

Daniel F

8:03 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

Weather,

The TSPLOST, as indicated by the the 'SPLOST' element of the tittle, is a Special Local Option SALES Tax. Businesses are just collectors, vehicles, not payers of said tax. Doesn't effect them one way or the other. Sales tax.

Reply
Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

9:40 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

I know EXACTLY what it is. It's a tax the employees of a relocating company would have to pay.

I stand by my statement.

Frank Jones

8:49 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

Daniel...true, businesses don't pay the tax yet the will benefit greatly from it. AS a sales tax, it is designed to be paid at a disproportionate rate by those who spend their entire paychecks in order to exist, the poor and working class.

Also, a flaw with sales taxes is that a significant portion estimated at 15 to 20 are never remitted to the state and are stolen by the collecting business. Have you ever been to a restaurant that doesn't use the register correctly? Ever hear of a person underreporting his sales? Ever hear of a business wanting to be paid in cash? Guess what, you're paying them your sales tax dollars and they're keeping it. How does that make you feel?

Reply

DavidE

9:19 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

TSPLOST= The Stupid People Looting our Sales Tax

Reply
Comment_arrow

Meinert

12:46 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

not as clever as you think.

Ed Varn

9:37 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

Why would anyone who's seen the "success" that Peach Pass is NOT vote for TSPLOST? (Sarcasm heavily intended.)

Reply

Marsi Thrash

10:33 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

The project list is set -- and there are Peach Passes in it. And no, the money cannot go into a general fund. Read the enabling legislation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bobby Flournoy

2:53 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Marsi, I agree. Many people have note read what it actually is or is not, on both sides of the equation. Voters need to READ what they are voting for, then make an educated decision.

Comment_arrow

bulldogger

3:36 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Bobby, I don't really have to read all the details......all I have to see is this....."Politicians are trying to raise my tax bill in a lousy economy"........this ain't smart and it ain't gonna work......

DavidE

12:14 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

DOT spent $50-60 million of our money on the HOT lanes, then they want to charge us to use the lanes we paid for? Now they want more of our money to waste?

No thank you..

Peach Pass my A..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Space Ship

1:08 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

Describe how you paid for HOT lanes.

Comment_arrow

DavidE

2:50 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

We paid with our tax dollars, federal and state taxes, plus the Chinese chipped in 40% of the costs. It didn't magically appear in the hands of the DOT.

Frank Jones

6:10 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

If the politicians have the will, they can require any new tax to be use exclusively for a stated purpose. As such, an additional 1/2% income tax could be enacted to specifically fund transportation.

Some people favor toll roads, however, toll roads add an additional buracracy and costs while indebting the state and taxing the use, not the benefit derived from the toll road.

Income tax is the best way to generate income for the state as it taxes the benefit of state functions. The primary purpose for roads is for commerce/income...transportation of goods and services and labor. Recreational use is minimal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eric Hovdesven

6:23 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Good point on the justification of using an income tax. though I think raising income taxes by 1/2% would go way above and beyond what they are hoping to raise with the 1% sales tax.

American Patriot

7:18 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@Eric gasoline and diesel are taxed on a per gallon sold not as a percentage of the sale and we are actually driving a lot less today then we were ten years ago. Current consumption of gasoline is below 2001 levels. @Frank is correct when it comes to tolls. They wont work and will only add to more big gov. Adding a gps in a vehicle to calculate miles driven has some merit however I am not comfortable with big brother in my car. The problem with increasing the income tax is it won't go away and the money will flow into the general fund. At least with a SPLOST it has a stated purpose and term. True they can be hard to get rid of but that is mostly because the politicians can point out things they have done with the money to make things better. I know we would not have the parks we have in Gwinnett with out a SPLOST.

Reply

Frank Jones

10:01 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@American...the Federal gas tax is and has been fixed at 18.4 CPG since 1993. Considering inflation, the federal tax has gone done be roughly 40% since 1993. In Georgia, the tax is per gallon but is adjusted semi-annually based upon the current sale price. As such, it changes as the retail price changes.

I agree that using income tax as a means of assessing transportation dollars would be problematic unless the Gold Dome passed a law requiring the additional rate to be transferred to the transportation fund. It would be very simple to do, but probably too difficult for our legislators to figure out...they aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer!

Lastly, don't credit any of the Splosts with anything. They Splosts were simply a mechanism that was sold to the public...they are simply a means to raise taxes when the politicians are too weak kneed to what's right and afraid of Norquist's no new tax pledge.

Reply
Comment_arrow

American Patriot

10:06 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

@Frank I think we are saying the same thing. It seems we both believe the mechanism to provide funding to build and maintain our roads is broken. Which is why I am considering the TSPLOST. I have not made up my mind yet if this is the way to go. It's dialog like this that helps. I hear what you are saying about SPLOST's however I am not sure I agree. I am a transplant and have lived here for 20 years. When I first moved here there was not much in terms of infrastructure. You may not agree and I respect that but I believe we have some of the best parks and libraries in the country. We were also able to rapidly expand our public safety departments. I believe these were all paid for w/SPLOST money and that the county did not issue bonds to pay for those projects. Where I am from we don't have a SPLOST system and I often wonder if did would we get more projects done. My argument being is that when the money goes into the general fund then it's a free for all for which ever political party is most powerful at the time. Budgets are made and projects decided on. Sure we can vote out the people if we don't like what they did but often the damage would have already been done by the time the next election rolls around and we are stuck w/what they gave us. At least w/a SPLOST the money must be spent on it's stated purpose. I understand that there will still be wrangling going on for who gets their projects built first. I also like the fact that SPLOST's have an end date.

Eric Hovdesven

11:38 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@ American FJ is right except he didn't explain the entire state mechanism. The State portion is a constitutionally restricted cents per gallon, I believe 7 cents, plus a 3% legislatively restricted amount. As gas prices rise this 3% portion is adjusted to be a per gallon amount. And Deal recently did not adjust the price up.

Bottom line the state portion which frankly is the amount that is of limited supply does go up with the rise in gas prices.

Reply

Frank Jones

2:26 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

@American...There is much to be discussed and unfortunately, the state and local chamber is throwing a lot of money behind T-Splost in their attempt to "Educate" us. I agree that we have been able to fund schools, parks, and libraries using Splost taxes, however, my contention is that we could have achieved the same results with another funding mechanism. The Gold Dome sells us splost "Vote for Splost Or Else!". It's an easy way for the politicians to raise taxes without raising taxes...but that's why we elected them, to manage state revenue and allocate funds as necessary. In a typical business, they're all be fired for failing to do their job!

So back to the issue of T-Splost or no T-Splost. I say no as:

1. The tax is regressive
2. They're billing it as solving Atlanta's traffic problem -- it won't.
3. Some projects have nothing to do with traffic such as landing lights at the Cobb County(?) airport.
4. Individuals will bare the burden, but businesses will reap the benefits.
5. All of Georgia will benefit, but only Atlanta will pay.
6. Atlanta probably sends substantial money to the rest of the state for their roads.
7. There's ample waste within the current budget that could be used to help solve problems but they won't address. Items such as: corporate welfare, $50+ million of private school funding, and more.

Reply

American Patriot

3:44 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

@Frank your bullets are valid. I do not believe the TSPLOST will solve much of our traffic issues and anyone who does does not have a clue. The only way we are going to do that is to find a way to reduce the current car count on our roads. I would like to change the projects that would be implemented with the TSPOLST to include expanding our modes of transportation. We need to expand the ways we get in and around the metro. There is no reason a major expansion of MARTA should not be on this project list. I would include that to be more buses and a much more expansive rail system. I hear what you are saying about being a regressive tax and that the people in and around Atlanta would pay for it and the business would get all the benefit. Here is something to ponder though. If in fact we could improve our system of transportation and employers did show up and higher people would that not have a direct effect on the people in the county? I could see property values rising again and at least the poorest among us who may not be the best trained would at least have a better chance of getting a job and helping themselves up the latter. The money needs to come from somewhere and I would prefer not to issue debt to fund these projects. I wonder if we should take our chances at passing the TSPLOST and then change the projects to be funded. Big risk I know and I probably would not take it either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

North Georgia Weather

3:49 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Whoa... you do realize that MARTA can't support itself don't you? And you want to expand MARTA why? So everyone else can help pay for it? No thank you.

Comment_arrow

Eric Hovdesven

4:31 pm on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

The legislation supposedly prohibits changing the project list or adding projects to it. However there is a great deal of ambiguity in the descriptions, particularly the 600 million for Cobb Transit - that looks like its going to enhanced Bus Service but that won't cost 600 Million, so its not clear where the excess funds will go - likely to roads or the 75 HOT lanes since the express bus service would use the HOT lanes.

Also projects may not be built. For example it could be that the Emory Rail line would not have enough money once the study was completed or that getting the ROW might be successfully fought in court by impacted neighbors. If that happens the money not spent on a project that doesn't get picked gets distributed to the counties or conceivably could be used for project overruns on other projects on the list.

Unfortunately they will not be adding more transit. I believe they won't build all the transit projects.

Comment_arrow

Chris Murphy

8:45 am on Saturday, June 9, 2012

MARTA doesn't support itself. Sidewalks don't support themselves. Streets and roads don't support themselves. Highways (other than toll roads) don't support themselves. Airports don't completely support themselves. Railroads mostly support themselves, but were given the land their tracks use (and much, much more that they sold). Ports don't support themselves.

So what's your point?

Scott

7:22 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Anybody get in on this tonight? I just realized the Gwinnett call was scheduled for 6:15pm. With traffic as bad as it is I how many people do they think are home (and settled) by that time? I missed it. Will hope they do the download like they have for the others.

If you made the call did you learn anything earth shattering?

Reply

R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

12:54 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Gwinnett call was scheduled for 6:15pm. The cheerleading CIDs and Chamber of Commerce staff didn't want to hang out too long...

The talking point about "companies won't locate here if this isn't passed" is misleading - since the 10 year plan has already been revealed as NOT changing commute times at all per ARC - SO ATLANTA will REMAIN TIED Up.

Why are we here again if it MAKES no DIFFERENCE and how does that attract business? (Unless they profit directly from construction or supporting services)

Second the claim " we have to do SOMETHING" is valid, but my take is different than the talking point because I agree we HAVE to do SOMETHING which is START over in REALITY.

Promising other people's money to get more FEDERAL dollars that are NOT guaranteed is short term foolishness because the bulk of the money is OURS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Floyd Akridge

12:59 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

R...overall it does make a difference...a negative one. Traffic will be screwed up for years by the projects and increasing taxes in a weak economy is the textbook definition of foolishness. I still am stunned that Republicans created the tax increase. In my mind, any Republican that is for a tax increase in this economy needs to grab the independant ballot.

bulldogger

8:38 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

"R", you're absolutely correct.....the Federal Bureaucracy thinks it's doing us a favor by giving us money, when in fact the money they're "giving" us is what we've "Given" them and now they're giving us back a pittance of it after paying all their "Costs" of administering "our" money........what a racket and it needs to come to a screeching halt......

Reply

Jimmy Orr

1:38 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

bulldogger, you are absoltely correct. That is why it behooves us taxpayers to hanmmer away at our two U.S. Senators and our Congressman to put the axe to the 900 Federal grant programs and the 2,001 (last count) Federal subsidy programs and the bureaucracy which administers same and put that money back in our pockets. Federal grants and subsidies to feed the public transit hogs that will not pay for themselves are among those grant and subsidy programs. The immediate need though is to handle business at the ballot box on July 31st.

Reply

Melaine

7:13 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

The ARC actually admits that this tax and the 10 years it will take to get as many projects on the list as they can finish will not fix the traffic problems in Atlanta. The roundtable is touting that this tax and the projects it will finance will bring jobs to Atlanta but we have problems that this tax will not fix. Water supply is going to be a big problem, the infrastructure in Atlanta is aging quickly and the increase in water fees is not keeping up with the capital needed to keep in working order much less update the system. Bonds, more fees, raising the water rates further or new taxes will be needed there as well. The education system has given our fair city a very public black eye that is going to take a marketing miracle to repair any time soon. The accusations of wrong doing with the bidding process at Hartsfield are ongoing and cast a pall over the city as well. Who is going to see us as a good bet for moving their business here? It will still take tax huge tax incentives to bribe them here. Passing a tax that admittedly will not fix the regions traffic problems nor have jobs pouring in except for some construction jobs that are not permanent does not seem like a good bet to me. .

Reply

Lithia Springs Native

7:47 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Looking at a map of Georgia will show that all Interstates flow into/out of Atlanta. A motorist cannot get through the State on a decent road without going through Atlanta. The GDOT has created this problem, and the TSPLOST does not address the root cause. There are no plans in the TSPLOST to build a limited access highway from Columbus to Macon to Augusta, from Augusta to Savannah, or a bypass around Atlanta going north-south. The TSPLOST list is trying to fix problems the currently exist but does not plan for the future. There will be no money for these projects.

Reply

David

9:07 pm on Saturday, June 9, 2012

Businesses don't relocate to areas because they have good roads. If that were true, Atlanta and Charlotte would have all the businesses in the East since we have all the interstates. They relocate because state governments give them tax abatements. The states then increase taxes on their citizens to make up the shortfall.

I like the way things are now: daily fatal accidents on our roads control population; Yankees bitch about Atlanta traffic and continue to move to FL so we don't have to put up with them; and I plan my day by avoiding rush hours on the interstate.

Count my vote as NO NEW TAXES!!

Reply

Tom Doolittle

12:39 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Wrong way Guv--just lowered the gas tax. Unbelievably out of the other corner of his mouth he supports TSPLOST. He said he reduced the gas tax --and I quote from AJC--"taking extra money from tax payers now (referring to the economy) is the wrong move." Ummm...what exactly is the TSPLOST Guv?
In fact, the TSPLOST is EXTRA--while the gas tax is not--its already in place. He thinks we're all morons.

Reply

Brian Crawford

8:06 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

I'm not a fan of the TSPLOST because I feel the entire state should bear the burden of infrastructure projects that benefit all Georgians through higher state wide taxes and budgetary priorities. That being said, if that is the only way these projects are going to get done then so be it, I'll hold my nose and vote for it.

Our state is being completely mismanaged and will continue to be as long as Georgians vote for any idiot with an (R) by their name.

Reply

JAH

11:59 am on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Where were you when the idiots with a (D) by their name were running the government of Georgia for over 100 years? It wasn't any better. This just proves that politicians are politicians, regardless of political affiliation. I hope everyone that considers themselves a (D) or an (R) now realize that, in Georgia at least, it doesn't matter. They are animals of the same stripes.

Reply

Tom Doolittle

1:51 pm on Sunday, June 10, 2012

Brian--you don't have to hold your nose and vote "yes". I mean to say, you do have to hold your nose IF you vote yes--but you don't have to vote yes. The legislature can only be held accountable to their responsibility to govern if this "crap against the wall" is turned back. Waiting in the wings is a forced "decision to decide" with the tools already provided to invest in new infrastructure and plan for our future--increased gas taxes, additional gas tax recapture from the feds, state bonds, user fees (tolls) and special self-taxing districts (CIDs) with federal matching.
Referenda in general represent "decisions not to decide" by the people elected to make tough decisions. Do not let them off the hook. As the AJC columnist stated today--question the urgency of "now". Send this putrid mess back from whence it came.

Reply

Ms.

9:30 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

I VERY reluctantly voted for E-SPLOST, I thought it would be a huge mistake giving Dekalb any more money to mismanage. But I listened to all of the pleas, "think of the children, don't you care about children???" and wound up voting yes. Now we have learned the true nature of what pss poor management DCSS is really under, that nothing has changed since the last admin, and giving them another penny was just a colossal mistake.

I just can't see voting to raise any more taxes. If you're eager to pay more taxes, don't worry, if you're in Dekalb, they're going up if you just wait it out a bit. After the absurd assessments, you'll get a new soapbox derby as a consolation prize.

I think light rail around CDC/Emory would be neat, and I'd really like to see something like that happen, but now is just not a good time, maybe all the brilliant minds over that way can work out something that isn't tied to SPLOST. If Deal would agree to take down the toll booths on 400 as was supposed to happen a while ago, I could reluctantly get behind this, but that's not going to happen, so I'll be voting no.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey Allen

9:49 am on Monday, June 11, 2012

I think many people only actually read what was in the ESPLOST's around the region after they voted for it. It's easy to get duped into the "Think of the Children" nonsense. Here in Walton County, people voted it in by a 2-1 margin, because they rally cry out here was a vauge plea to "Help the Teachers"

Only AFTER it was too late did people realize that they voted to fund a parking lot and some laptops of administrators. The Ol' Bait n Switch worked.

You don't buy a car, then check under the hood. The time to kick the tires is before you fork over your money. Taxes are no different. LOOK at what they want to do, LOOK at what they've done in the past, and LOOK at your own willingness to pay additional taxes at a time like this.

Then vote NO as loudly as you can

Floyd Akridge

12:55 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

I wouldn't vote for T-splost at gunpoint. Narrow minded projects that offer very little help in the end and screw up traffic for years to get there and paid for in a manner that is the worst idea of them all.

T-Splost? Hell no.

Reply

Leave a comment